Rabobank Libor case highlights “transatlantic disparity”
By Rahul Rose
“Andrew Smith at Corker Binning in London said the disparity between UK and US authorities could be attributable to a funding gap.
“The DoJ has vast resources, even compared to the SFO’s blockbuster funding. As a result there is the danger that the DoJ identifies suspects at an early stage, and before the SFO has considered whether they could or should be prosecuted in the UK,” Smith said. “This can lead to an unfortunate outcome for suspects who would prefer to avoid US prosecution, which often ends in harsher sentences than those applicable in the UK.”
…
Commenting on recent changes in British and American extradition law, Andrew Smith said that the UK-US Extradition Treaty of 2003 removed the requirement for American authorities to provide prima facie evidence. As a result “virtually no weight” is given to evidence when deciding whether to resist or approve an extradition request in British courts, meaning people can be extradited on “weak” grounds, according to Smith.
“There are grounds on which a defendant could resist a request. For example, potential human rights violations or prejudicial treatment,” Smith said. “But the UK’s courts look very favourably on the US legal system. It is assumed that a defendant will be treated fairly in America.””
Read the full article in Global Investigations Review here.
Latest Comments
Comments
Edward Grange quoted in The Independent and Evening Standard on extradition of suspect in Sara Sharif case
August 21 2023
Comments
Edward Grange quoted in Criminal Law Week on “Suceava District Court, Romania v Gurau [2023]”
May 16 2023
Comments
Edward Grange comments on High Court decision to block Mike Lynch’s bid to avoid extradition to the US
April 21 2023
News & Insights | Comments | Andrew Smith |