Justice secretary Robert Buckland, QC, has stated that individuals accused of serious crimes should remain anonymous until they have been charged if they have a reputation to protect.
Partner Edward Grange has said in response to this: “It has long been a justification for naming those accused of serious sexual offences that doing so would encourage other potential victims to come forward. That justification seems less compelling when considering anonymity for those accused of other criminal offences. It is to be welcomed.
“However, the thought that such anonymity would only apply to those that have a reputation to protect would risk alienating those who are not rich and famous who find themselves caught up in the criminal justice system. It is not only celebrities who have reputations to preserve.”
Please click here for coverage from The Daily Telegraph, Sky News, Daily Mail and Yahoo! News.
Latest Comments
Comments
Proposed SFO scheme would offer financial incentives for whistleblowers – Partner Nick Barnard quoted
October 15 2026
Comments
Police Raids on Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor’s Royal Properties Were Unlawful Danielle Reece-Greenhalgh quoted in National, Regional and Trade Media
October 13 2026
Comments
How Crispin Odey Ruling Puts Spotlight On Handling Of Non-Financial Misconduct
September 22 2026

News & Insights | Comments | Edward Grange |