The SFO’s success in two foreign bribery cases involving UK companies means the government should reconsider its decision to abandon a corporate offence of failure to prevent economic crime, lawyers and politicians say.
Calls for change to the UK’s corporate criminal liability laws come after the Crown Prosecution Service’s decision to drop a phonehacking case against News Group Newspapers, a subsidiary of News UK, which is in turn a subsidiary of Rupert Murdoch’s global media company, News Corp.
In justification of this decision, the director of public prosecutions, Alison Saunders, said on 11 December: “The present state of the law means it is especially difficult to establish criminal liability against companies with complex or diffuse management structures.” However, some lawyers questioned whether the two recently concluded SFO Section 7 cases necessarily strengthen the argument for a reconsideration of the offence.
Jessica Parker at Corker Binning in London told GIR that the SFO’s two recent corporate bribery cases are insufficient to merit a policy change.
“There needs to be more analysis of how well Section 7 works,” she said. “Two cases, a guilty plea and a DPA, are simply not sufficient to determine this.”
Read the full article in Global Investigations Review here.
Edward Grange quoted in Criminal Law Week on “Suceava District Court, Romania v Gurau ”
May 16 2023
Edward Grange comments on High Court decision to block Mike Lynch’s bid to avoid extradition to the US
April 21 2023
David Corker comments on the effectiveness of sanctions in The Law Society Gazette
April 5 2023
News & Insights | Comments | Jessica Parker |