The Home Office recently reported that the total number of arrests has fallen from 1.5 million in 2008 to 779,660 in 2017 (a total drop of 48%).
Associate Nick Barnard commented:
“In fairness to the police, it should be acknowledged that making an arrest is not a prerequisite for an offence to be properly investigated. In many cases arrest is not only unnecessary but in fact undesirable, particularly when considering the consequences for a suspect who acquires an ‘arrest record’ even if he or she is never charged. This issue is being increasingly recognised by the police through suspects being interviewed on a voluntary basis, which avoids the need for detention, as well as the stigma of an arrest.
“It is also correct to say that the Home Office has encouraged other forms of responding to crime, such as community resolutions, which keep offenders away from courts and prisons. However, the connection between such disposals and the decision whether to arrest a suspect in the first place is unclear.
“Overall, the statistics released today are fairly stark. Despite the shift in attitude towards voluntary interviews and new means of disposal, one would still expect arrests to have moved in the same direction as reported crime, albeit hopefully to a lesser proportion. However, the former has plummeted whilst the latter has grown. The most obvious and unfortunate causative factor must be the continuing dwindle of police resources.”
This was originally published in The Law Society Gazette and can be found here.
Nick Barnard comments on the subtle shift in government rhetoric regarding crypto regulations
February 2 2023
Nick Barnard writes about crypto wallet freezing orders in Thomson Reuters
January 25 2023
Peter Binning comments on regulatory regimes in the Financial Times
January 25 2023